Once thought to be in the pocket of the Religious Right, many American evangelicals today are discovering a deeper understanding of what it means to be pro-life.
Kenny Hiser, communications director from Sojourners sent this article to me that will be their cover article in November, it’s called “The Meaning of ‘Life.'” For the article the authors interviewed 21 Christians from nine cities around the country, representing 6 ethnicities and aged between 26-66, they were asked about the issues that matter most to them. The key discussion that takes place in this article is that ‘life’ is still a really important issue for Christian Evangelicals and for a majority of the people interviewed here it is being interpreted in far broader than has been typical for those influenced by the Religious Right. I appreciated reading through this and seeing how politics for at least some Evangelicals is starting to shift and I think you too will appreciate the holistic outlook that comes from these Christians, even if you disagree on some of their points. Click “read more” to see the article.
The Meaning of Life
–By Jim Rice and Jeannie Choi
Joshua Hopping of Sweet, Idaho, helped put George W. Bush in the White House, and four years later helped keep him there. As an evangelical Christian, Hopping was part of the so-called values voters bloc that some pundits credit with Bushs electoral success.
But this year, Hopping isnt a lock to support the Republican ticket. He says hes open to consider which candidate best embodies his Christian valuesand that very openness represents what could be one of the most significant shifts in this election season, because evangelicals, especially those under 30, are no longer a safe bet to vote for the furthest-right option on the ballot.
Why the loosening of party attachment? The questions that matter most to Hopping, 28, arent as narrowly defined as they used to be. He says hell be paying close attention to what the candidates are saying about the issues most important to him, which now include not only abortion and same-sex marriage but also the environment, poverty, and immigrationand thats not even counting the war in Iraq, health care, social security, and all those other things that are important, Hopping told Sojourners. Looking at the records of the two parties on those issues, Hopping says, gave him pause about the unquestioned convictions he held in the past. I said, wait a minute, I want to take another look and see whos out there, who actually cares about life beyond the womb. Hopping says this line of thinking feels outside of his conservative comfort zone, but he cannot ignore his new convictions, particularly about the environment.
Eight years ago, I began working in the environmental field, and it really hit me that God tells us to take care of the environment. The more I read the Bible, I see that the environment affects the poor, the young, and the oldthe same people God said to go reach, he says.
While Hopping may seem like an anomaly, recent reports show that he is not alone. Since about 2005 we have seen a sharp decline in the number of people calling themselves Republicans, reported Scott Keeter, director of survey research at the Pew Research Center, based on surveys released in early September. Evangelical voters have displayed a great deal of dissatisfaction with the current state of things, including the Republican Party, said John C. Green, senior fellow in religion and American politics at the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.
And while polls showed a surge of evangelical support for the Republican ticket after the nomination of Sarah Palin, Keeter said that it was unlikely to last: Some of what we are seeing now may be, if not ephemeral, subject to change with further events in the campaign.
Since there has not been a correlating increase in young evangelical affiliation with the Democratic Party, some observers feel that the evangelical vote is much less predictable than in years pastand may hinge on the question of whether a narrow concept of what it means to affirm life is enough.
To get a better picture of how evangelical views are changing, Sojourners interviewed 21 people from nine citiesincluding Seattle; Columbus, Ohio; Boston; Leawood, Kansas; Atlanta; Houston; Pittsburgh, and Boise, Idahorepresenting six different ethnicities and ranging from ages 26 to 66. The conversations suggested a significant shift in evangelical viewpointa transformation with the potential to shake up not only political assumptions but the very face of evangelicalism in the years to come.
Upholding All Life
For most evangelicals, being pro-life continues to be the central factor in their political discernment. That fact has led some political observers to declare that evangelicals will once again support the Republican ticket this fall in overwhelming numbers (in 2004, George Bush won 79 percent of the 26.5 million evangelical votes, according to exit polling).
But this year, many evangelicals, especially among those born since the 1970s, are coming to understand pro-life in broader ways, and the impact of that new perspective remains to be seen. As Time Magazines Amy Sullivan put it in early September, While Palin is inspiring rhapsodies from the lions of the Christian right, her appeal to more moderate and younger evangelicalsas well as independent swing votersmay be limited.
For instance, a self-described anti-abortion evangelical commenting on Jesus Creed, a leading blog of the emergent church, wrote that policies that fight poverty, work for health-care justice, and generally improve economic conditions for poor and working-class people will likely result in the number of abortions decreasing much more than under an administration that simply declares itself opposed to Roe vs. Wadeand thus supporting the former initiatives should arguably be considered more pro-life than the latter.
Those efforts to address the root factors that have been shown to contribute to increased numbers of abortionsabortion-reduction measuresspeak to the desire of many evangelicals to move from divisive rhetoric about abortion to actual results. Adam Hamilton, founding pastor of the United Methodist Church of the Resur rection outside of Kansas City, Kansas, says a key question is, Are you interested in actually reducing the number of abortions even if you cant completely sway people to your opinion? I think thats where the abortion debate needs to move.
The abortion-reduction issue became a focal point at both of the national conventions this summer, with the parties moving in opposite directions. The Democrats, pushed by evangelicals, Catholics, and others, added abortion-reduction language to their platform: We also recognize that … health care and education help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and thereby also reduce the need for abortions. The Demo cratic Party also strongly supports a womans decision to have a child by ensuring access to and availability of programs for pre- and post-natal health care, parenting skills, income support, and caring adoption programs.
The Republican Party, on the other hand, took a step back from abortion-reduction language. As The Wall Street Journal put it, For all their pro-life pieties, the Republicans at this years convention, while asserting their opposition to Roe, dropped platform language that invited all persons of good will, whether across the political aisle or within our party, to work together to reduce the incidence of abortion.
Commenting on the party platforms, Cameron Strang, editor of Relevant Magazine, said that commitments to reduce the number of abortions could appeal to young evangelicals who have a more holistic view of the meaning of pro-life.
For some evangelicals, even those who consider themselves strongly pro-life, the issue of abortion doesnt have a lot of influence on how they vote in presidential elections. For example, Bo Lim, a member of Quest Church in Seattle, said that abortion, along with several other moral concerns, dont rise to the top of my list of issues in regard to the election because of the limited role the president or our government can do in regard to these issues.
EVANGELICALS ACROSS the country tell stories of their own transformation from a narrow concern for one or two issues to a broader understanding of the Christian call. Eugene Cho in many ways exemplifies these new evangelicals.
When Cho started Seattles Quest Church in 2001, he began with a handful of people meeting in his living room. Quest Church has grown to a congregation of more than 500 members, many of them young evangelical Christ ians.
Personally, I dont want to be defined by one or two issues, Cho says. Obviously two of the bigger issues that are highlighted by certain groups of the Christian segment are gay marriage and abortion. And while I acknowledge that they are important to me, I simply dont elevate them over other issues. I must juxtapose them with the war in Iraq, local and global poverty, and human rights.
That opinion is shared by Rich Nathan, pastor of Vineyard Church of Columbus in Columbus, Ohio, and host of last springs Justice Revival, co-sponsored by Sojourners. As the pastor of one of the largest churches in the Vineyard movement, with more than 6,500 members, Nathan considers the importance of the sanctity of life and the least of these when thinking about the upcoming elections.
I believe that the measure of a culture is how we treat the weakest person in the culture, the most defenseless, Nathan says. As a result, a serious abortion-reduction plan remains one of the most important issues for Nathan as he decides whom to vote for in November. But the weakest and most defenseless people in a culture do not only include unborn children, Nathan says.
God is always on the side of the marginalized, the people who are the weakest and poorest. That includes the unborn and their mothers, but it also includes people who lack health insurance and folks who cant find jobs in a global economy. It includes children and women who are being trafficked into sex slavery, and it includes the people of Darfur, Nathan told Sojourners.
This broader perspective has loosened party attachment for many evangelicals. As Marlon Hall, pastor of The Awakenings Movement, a Houston church, put it, Im not voting for a candidate or a party; Im voting for principles.
Similarly, for Teresa Norman, a member of Chos Seattle congregation, being pro-life is more than just a side to take in the abortion debate; rather, it is a consistent ethic with which to consider other issues.
To be consistently pro-life would mean being pro-everyones-life, not just the lives of the unborn and not just those who are demographically, economically, racially, culturally, or religiously similar to us, she says.
The Impact of the War
Support for the sanctity of life affects the views of many evangelicals on the Iraq war. Thats the case for Sokol Haxhi nasto, a member of Park Street Church, a historic evangelical church in Boston, founded in 1809, where William Lloyd Gar rison delivered his first major public address against slavery. Since 2003, Haxhinasto has been dismayed by Americas presence in Iraq.
From the Christian point of view, the war does not send a message of loving your enemies, Haxhinasto, a doctoral student at Harvard Medical School, told Sojourners. The war is certainly not pro-life, and so I wonder, how can you be pro-life on abortion and then go into a war that isnt pro-life?
Pat McWherter, a member of Vineyard Church of Columbus and a retired Vietnam War veteran, agrees. For McWherter, his Christian convictions and his firsthand experience with war are enough for him to believe that the war in Iraq must end.
We got into the Iraq war, right or wrong, and now we have an obligation to develop and execute a political and military endgame that will ensure that the Iraqi people have a stable and viable government to conduct their countrys affairs and provide for their sovereignty, McWherter asserts. Once accomplished, U.S. troops should be compelled to come home.
Haxhinasto and McWherter are not lone voices for peace in the evangelical community. For Cho, dissatisfaction with the Iraq war grew over time. This issue has become increasingly important over the last four years, Cho says. I am eager to carefully scrutinize not only the respective candidates views on the war, but their overall vision in engaging the larger worldboth friend and foe.
That raises an issue that many evangelicals consider equally important to a timely exit from Iraq: fostering improved relations around the world. For Dan Ra, 26, a member of The Living Room, an emergent community in Atlanta, U.S. foreign policy in recent years has altered his political perspective. Eight years ago I was a freshman in college, and I didnt know who to vote for, Ra says. Most of my Christian friends were voting for Bush and my non-Christian friends were voting for Gore, and I guessed it would have been appropriate to vote for Bush, since I had aligned with what my Christian friends believed. Since then, though, the more aware I became, the more upset I became.
Ra says that hes tired of U.S. militarism. I am tired of an America that plays the bully, he says. America needs to re-establish itself as a fair country, and what were doing in Iraq and what were not doing in Sudan, and what were not doing even in our own country by not closing down Guantanamo Bay, is sending a message to the rest of the world that we are a bunch of militaristic cowboys.
For Nathan, pastor of the Columbus Vineyard church, improved foreign relations is as much a concern for the church as it is a concern for the government, and he says hes troubled by surveys that the rest of the world hold America in almost complete disdain. We rank lower than China and Russia across the globe as threats to global peace. As a result, its increasingly difficult for American missionaries to gain a hearing in and around the world, particularly in Muslim countries. Missionaries recently came to Nathan to plead with him to tell American Christians to have a more balanced perspective regarding Middle Eastern policy, and particularly to urge Americans to care about the rights of Palestinians. For too long, Nathan says, U.S. Christians have maintained a narrow view of the world. Today, their ideas of justice and mercy must expand beyond this continent, into the furthest reaches of the world.
I am a citizen of the kingdom and a citizen of the world before I am a citizen of America, he says. As a Christian, I cant think only in terms of narrow American self-interest. I really do need to think about what will promote the kingdom of God and Gods agenda.
Caring for All Creation
Considering oneself a citizen of the world, as Nathan says, has compelled many evangelicals to also view the environment as an important issue for the upcoming electionan issue that has, until recently, been largely considered a liberal cause. For many evangelicals, caring for the creation is inextricably linked to Gods mandate to Adam and Eve in Genesis.
Creation care has certainly grown to become an issue of greater importance for me, more so than previous elections, says Jason Chatraw, a member of Vineyard Boise church in Boise, Idaho, but it has for every candidate in every local, state, and national electionwhich I believe is a good thing and probably a result of the growing number of evangelicals involved in this movement.
Hamilton, Church of the Resur rection pastor in Kansas, sees this election as an important opportunity to address issues of waste and consumption in the United States. People want to think differently about the environment, and its a wonderful moment to retrain peoples habits, Hamilton says.
Tri Robinson, pastor of Vineyard Boise, began to see environmental matters in a new light after an eventful conversation with his two young-adult children. They came to me and said, as Christians, they had nobody to vote for, Robinson remembers. On the one hand, they would have to vote against the sanctity of life, and on the other hand, they would have to vote against caring for the environment. This conversation launched Robinson into a deep and careful look into the scriptures, where he was surprised to find an overwhelming call from God for creation care. This led to his writing several books about the Christian call to creation care, including Saving Gods Green Earth: Rediscovering the Churchs Responsibility to Environ mental Stewardship.
Several formative trips he took to Burma from 1982 to 1985 also informed Robinsons understanding that the issue of creation care was linked to problems of poverty and even human sex trafficking in developing nations abroad. There wasnt a bird chirping or one moving or living thing in that land, Robinson says, and I realized that a bad environment leads to polluted water, which leads to infant mortality, world hunger, illiteracy, and even human trafficking in the face of a dying economy. You cant deal with isolated issues. All of these problems are related.
An Interconnected World
Robinson represents many of the new evangelical voters who are coming out of their conservative traditions and challenging themselves to see the world in a different wayas a world where one issue is connected to another through a series of systems. The fragile environment contributes to a broken economic system that creates a society of haves and have-nots. The resulting injustice is what is compelling most, if not all, of these new evangelical voters to look beyond wedge issues to fight for the rights of all people.
Social justice, then, remains at the heart of the new evangelical voters focus in this election year, as demonstrated by Irene Yoon, a member of Quest Church in Seattle and a fervent advocate of efforts to help African peacekeepers in Darfur and to aid people in North Korea, China, sub-Saharan Africa, and elsewhere.
We must pursue justice to the best of our ability in our day-to-day lives. As we must love our neighbors, to me, that means taking care of each other, Yoon says. Caring for our local and global neighbors is a more vital role for government to play than policing the issues of gay marriage and abortion, she says, which are personal issues between individuals and God. God decides in the end who is righteous and who is not.
For Emily Brixius, a church mate of Yoons at Quest Church, one of the key ways to care for our neighbors is adequate health care for all. I really view health care as a moral issue, says Brixius, 27. If a country is going to uphold an ethic of life, then health care has to be a part of that. Christian Chin, another member of Quest Church, agrees that access to health care is a central moral issue for Christians. Its a disgrace that nearly 50 million people do not have any coverage in a nation as wealthy as ours, Chin says. We need universal health care now.
Nimma Bhusri, a member of The Vineyard Church of Ohio, thinks that issues such as the global AIDS crisis, genocide in Darfur, and particularly child prostitution and human trafficking are important to consider in the upcoming elections, a realization she has come to in her own devotional life and in her career as a fashion designer.
Living in central Ohio can become a bubble, but Darfur has been a huge issue that has been on the radar. Ive been much more exposed to the cause, and also to the cause of human trafficking, Bhusri says. Therefore, I understand that even though I am a fashion designer in Ohio, I am responsible for AIDS in Africa and for caring for the global poor.
Social injustice is near to the heart of God, explains Chatraw of Vineyard Boise. Its when as a Christian that I feed the poor, tend to the sick, and care for the orphans and widows that I fully embody the love of Christ.
It is precisely this inclusive thinking that exemplifies the remarkable transformation that has come over a demographic whose votes in previous elections were predictably based upon two wedge issues. Many evangelicals today are no longer comfortable voting on a narrow understanding of what constitutes a pro-life stance.
God is always on the side of life, Rich Nathan insists. Jesus said, I am not only the truth, but I am the life. And so we always press for the preservation of life. We always press toward the inclusion of our neighbors.
Jim Rice is editor and Jeannie Choi assistant editor of Sojourners.
Sojourners Readers Weigh In
Evangelical members of the Sojourners online constituency named poverty, peace, and health care as the issues they are most concerned about.
Top social/political concern?
12% War & Peace
11% Health Care
9% Consistent Ethic of Life
8% Human Rights
From a September 2008 survey of 1,505 Sojourners online readers.
In terms of discussion: what are your top social and political concerns? Would you call somewhere in line with this article, or some place else? And please state your own church background so we can have some context.