Barclay Press: Technology as a Powerful-Practice (Part 1)

Wikipedia I’ve put together a two-part essay on Technology as Power (or what I’m calling, using James McClendon, a powerful-practice) and the second part which I will publish in two weeks on the Quaker notion of “Gospel order” as a counterpoint to what Henry Jenkins calls participatory culture (think democratization of the web, re: youtube, wikis, twitter, discussion forums, blogs, web 2.0, etc). These two articles are an attempt to argue for a particular naming of technology from the church, and a watchful and transformative role in participating within this emerging culture. How the church reflects on such powers will determine and shape how the church’s mission looks in the 21st century. When I publish the second part I will also publish the whole article in .pdf form and make it available both here and at Barclay Press. The church’s interaction with and theological reflections on technology are areas I’ve been  interested in since I began studying with Ryan Bolger, he has guided me in much of this discussion and those of you who know his views will see them sneaking out all over the place.  I am pretty excited to finally get something more substantial out on the subject and I do hope you’ll read and be challenged by them.

Here’s the link to the article: Technology as a Powerful-Practice (Part 1)

And for those of you interested in previous articles looking at technology from a theological point of view you can view these links.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Published by

Wess

...is the William R. Roger Director of Friends Center and Quaker Studies at Guilford College in Greensboro, NC., PhD in Intercultural Studies from Fuller Theological Seminary, served as a "released minister" at Camas Friends Church, and father of three. He enjoys sketchnoting, sharing conversation over coffee with a friend, listening to vinyl and writing creative nonfiction.

2 thoughts on “Barclay Press: Technology as a Powerful-Practice (Part 1)”

  1. Wess – this is exciting! Selfishly, I can see how “technology” here is a bridge leading right into design/branding, along with countless other applications. It feels like your discussion with Bolger is laying an important groundwork. Keep on!

Comments are closed.